User Satisfaction Analysis of PDAM’s CATER System using Heuristic-SUS Evaluation

Stefanus Adin Seno Purdayanto, Penidas Fiodinggo Tanaem

Abstract


The Regional Drinking Water Company (PDAM) of Salatiga City, as a provider of clean water services, has implemented a web-based Meter Recording System (CATER) to enhance operational efficiency. However, the system's effectiveness has not been comprehensively evaluated in terms of usability, despite this factor being crucial for employee productivity and service quality. This study aims to assess the usability level of the CATER system by combining the Heuristic Evaluation (HE) and System Usability Scale (SUS) methods to identify the system's strengths and weaknesses and provide evidence-based recommendations for improvement. The evaluation results show that the system generally demonstrates good usability, with the highest HE scores in Visibility of System Status (89%) and Aesthetic Design (88%), indicating an informative and consistent interface.
However, weaknesses were identified in the areas of Recognition Rather Than Recall (68%) and Help Documentation (75%), suggesting a need for workflow simplification and more intuitive user guidance. The average SUS score of 75 (classified as Acceptable) supports the finding that the system is generally well-received by users, though there is still room for improvement.
Based on these findings, the study recommends improvements focusing on workflow simplification, the development of more contextual help features, and optimization of error prevention mechanisms. This study’s results are not only valuable for the further development of the CATER system but also serve as a reference for evaluating similar systems in other public utility sectors.

Keywords


Usability evaluation; heuristic evaluation; System Usability Scale (SUS); information system; public utility

Full Text:

PDF

References


T. Mawardi and I. Ikasari, “Peran Sistem Informasi Manajemen dalam Meningkatkan Efisiensi Operasional pada Perusahaan Skala Menengah,” Jurnal Artificial Inteligent dan Sistem Penunjang Keputusan, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://jurnalmahasiswa.com/index.php/aidanspk.

J. Mambu, J. Rewah, A. Iskak, and O. Sigarlaki, “Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Universitas Klabat menggunakan Framework COBIT 5.0 pada Domain MEA” Cogito Smart Journal |, Vol. 5, No. 2, p. 181. Tahun 2019, DOI : https://doi.org/10.31154/cogito.v5i2.190.181-190.

A. Prasetyo Utomo and N. Mariana, “Evaluasi Keberhasilan Sistem Informasi Universitas,” Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 565–579, 2023, [Online]. http://jurnal.mdp.ac.id.

M. Sulistiyono, “Evaluasi Heuristic Sistem Informasi Pelaporan Kerusakan Laboratorium Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta”, “ Jurnal Ilmiah DASI”, Vol 18, No 1 ,2017, https://ojs.amikom.ac.id/index.php/dasi/article/view/1832/0.

T. Putera, E. Saputra, M. Fronita, and A. Marsal, “Evaluasi Usability Aplikasi Pekanbaru dalam Genggaman menggunakan System Usability Scale (SUS)”, “SISTEMASI: Jurnal Sistem Informasi”, Vol 13, No 2, 2024, DOI : https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v13i2.3782.

R. R. Aditama, I. Gusti, L. Putra, and E. Prismana, “Penggunaan Metode Heuristic evaluation sebagai Analisis Usability dan Redesign Antarmuka pada Aplikasi JConnect Mobile Bank Jatim,” “JEISBI”, Vol 04, No 04, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jeisbi.v4i4.56834.

E. Iryanti, L. Ode, M. Zulfiqar, S. Kusumawardani, and I. Hidayah, “Pengukuran Kepuasan Penguuna E-Learning menggunakan Metode Evaluasi Heutistik dan System Usability Scale,” “JTIIK”, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 469–478, 2022, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.202294631.

A. Yahya and D. Prehanto “Analisis User Interface dan User Experience menggunakan Metode Heuristic Evaluation pada Aplikasi My FirstMedia”, “JEISBI”, Vol 03, No 03, 2022. DOI : https://doi.org/10.26740/jeisbi.v3i3.46953.

F. Kartika, S. Dewi, T. Adi, P. Sidhi, and Y. C. Darmawan, “Analisis Usability Web SIATMA dengan Metode Heuristic Evaluation dan System Usability Scale 87 Analisis Usability Web SIATMA dengan Metode Heuristic Evaluation dan System Usability Scale.”, “Jurnal Buana Informatika”,Vol 14, No 2, 2023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24002/jbi.v14i02.5027.

R. I. Situmorang, R. Yunis, and H. Hita, “Evaluasi Usability Portal Akademik UNIMED menggunakan Metode Heuristic dan System Usability Scale,” Remik, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 498–507, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.33395/remik.v6i3.11637.

B. Rudianto, “Implementasi Heuristic Evaluation dan System Usability Scale dalam Analisis Usability Aplikasi Precise,” Jurnal Sains dan Manajemen, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2024. DOI : https://doi.org/10.31294/evolusi.v12i2.23565.

W. S. Jangku, I. M. Candiasa, I. Made, and G. Sunarya, “Evaluasi Kualitas E-Government menggunakan Metode E-Govqual, Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) dan Heuristic Evaluation,” Media Online), Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 2294–2306, 2024, doi: 10.30865/klik.v4i4.1671.

J. Johnson, “Designing with the Mind in Mind”. Penerbit : M Kaufmann. 2010.

D. A. . Norman, The Design of Everyday Things : Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books, 2013.

T. Neusesser and E. Sunwall, “Error-Message Guidelines,” NNGROUP, May 2023 . https://www.nngroup.com/articles/error-message-guidelines/. Diakses: 1 juni 2025.

R. Badiu, “Memory Recognition and Recall in User Interfaces,” NNGROUP, Jan. 2024. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/recognition-and-recall/. Diakses: 1 juni 2025.

A. N. Hidayat and U. L. Yuhana, “Evaluasi Desain Antarmuka Website Sekolah Menengah Atas menggunakan Metode Heuristic Evaluation,” Jurnal Rekayasa Industri (JRI), Vol. 5, No. 2, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37631/jri.v5i2.944.

A. Kendrick, “Help and Documentation (Usability Heuristic #10),” Dec. 2020. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/help-and-documentation/. Diakses: 2 Juni 2025.

A. Bangor, P. Kortum, and J. Miller, “Determining what Individual SUS Scores Mean; Adding an Adjective Rating,” J. usability Stud., Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 114–23, 2009.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v14i6.5484

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 6 times
PDF - 1 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.